Introduction
In today’s South East Asia, countries are still
grappling with the dilemma of establishing military power and striking a midpoint
with democracy. Most Southeast Asian countries have experienced authoritarian
rule at one point or the other in their history. This has usually been coupled
with military dominance. More often than not, military dominance has prevailed
in Southeast Asia and still continues to dominate present regimes, at least in
the case of Burma (Fink, 2001). The road to
independence from military dominance is however not easy, with countries such
as Indonesia and Thailand having military dominance as pre-cursors to their
government composition. Nonetheless, this study identifies that military
dominance does not have any place in the future and arises out of affiliation
or non-affiliation to democratic states, monopoly of funding and educational
differences coupled with class stratification.
Affiliation
or Non-affiliation to Democratic Regimes
It is quite obvious that international influence
affects systems of governments around the world. For example, Western nations
have been on the forefront in supporting democratic governments around the
globe. The opposite is also true whereby non-affiliation to existing
democracies may be a gateway through which authoritarian or dictatorship
regimes are founded. For this reason, military dominance has found its way into
Southeast Asia because countries affiliate to other military states. This
therefore creates some sort of peer group whereby such states perpetrate this
type of rule. Philippines is a good example of a state that avoided military
rule because of its affiliation to the US while countries such as Burma and
Thailand have influenced each other into military rule because of their limited
affiliations to democratic states (Dog, 2010).
Military
Funding
When states separate military
funding from other government agencies, military rule can be easily witnessed
because the military will have autonomy from the state. This leads to an
all-powerful military which has the ability of running a state independently.
This has been a means through which some countries in Southeast Asia have
witnessed military rule. For instance, Thailand came under military rule
because its military had its own funding which empowered it to act independently
from existing bureaucratic systems (Dog, 2010).
Education
and Class Stratification
Indonesia is a good example of a country that
directly came under military regime because of class stratifications and
educational differences. The indigenous inhabitants of the country who were
very collaborative with the Dutch and the Ambonese were in a position to occupy
bureaucratic positions that existed in the country, thereby enabling them to be
economically powerful. This group therefore formed an educated elite class that
maintained legitimacy when the Dutch left the country, thereby ascending to
power by controlling the military (Dog, 2010).
Conclusion
With the world slowly embracing
democratic rule and international organizations such as United Nations (UN) at
the forefront of this initiative, there is little chance that military
dominance will prevail for long. As more and more people are being educated in
Southeast Asia, this type of rule is slowly being condemned and its supporters
slowly diminishing. It is important that education is entrenched in this part
of the world to sensitize people against this type of leadership because it has
been internationally proved that it can never uphold democracy. From this
study, it is evident that military dominance finds its authenticity from
educational differences and social stratification, autonomous funding of the
military and non affiliation to democratic states, and quite evidently,
military dominance has no place in the future.
References
Dog,
L. (2010). Authoritarianism in Southeast
Asia. Retrieved 3 August, 2010, from
http://hubpages.com/hub/Authoritarianism-in-Southeast-Asia
Fink, C. (2001). Living
Silence: Burma under Military Rule. New York: Zed Books
No comments:
Post a Comment