Introduction
Most firms are
routinely involved in recruitment processes. This is done in order to ensure
competence in all professionals that are hired. Understanding the applicants’
personality will thus ensure firms employs the right individuals to discharge
specific duties in the organizations. This paper examines personality profile
based on a judicial interview.
Thesis statement: Researching and visiting courts of law will help
formulate and implement the necessary reforms in the judiciary.
Interview
Interviewer: Good morning? Welcome to
judicial preliminary chambers. It is our pleasure to have you today sir.
Please, tell us about your background? I believe a “brief introduction”
will be sufficient.
Interviewee: Morning. It is my
delight too to be here today. I am Mr. Michael Jones from Ohio State in North
America. I was born in 1946 in the province of Mesopotamia where I grew up and
lived until I sat my o-level examinations. I relocated to England for my
university studies and later come back to practice law here in Ohio. I have been
practicing law for 16 years now.
Interviewer: Thank you Mr. Michael. The judiciary today is
facing some challenges in conducting its professional duties. What do you perceive as the greatest
hindrances to an effective judicial system and achieving judicial justice?
Mr. Michael: Judicial system should be
extremely thorough and dependable in discharging justice. In my practice I have identified inefficiencies that hinder
efficient judicial operation which can
only be tackled by a serious supportive judicial fraternity. One of the obstacles
is the court delay in delivery of verdicts on legal matters. Late court ruling on such cases denies the
aggrieved party prompt justice and thus the courts also propagate injustice by
denying victims prompt hearing.
Interviewer: Very nice to note of
your professional perception on our judicial processes and justice delivery.
What would you do to promote quick court rulings given the opportunity to spearhead
the judicial reforms in the country?
Mr. Michael: The backlog in our
courts today requires a devoted reformer to formulate and implement ambitious
judicial programs and procedures. I would devise a program that sees judge work
at least eight hours a day from the six-hours that they work today. More so, I
would increase access to judicial services by transferring minor judicial
responsibilities to other subsidiary courts.
I trust these measures would still restore judicial credibility as
evidence distortion would be minimal.
Interviewer: Thank you for the
ambitious insight Mr. Michael. In
carrying out prompt hearing and ruling, how would you maintain judicial
judgment quality that fuels public confidence in the judicial system.
Mr. Michael: Quality on judicial
judgment highly depends on judicial independence which lay another barrier to
the system. Interference on the course of jurisdiction is deeply rooted in the
judicial system. The judicial authority has to be separated from the political class. It is the prerogative of the jury to refer to
the applicable law pertaining to legal dispute, interpret the clause and apply
it accordingly. Only then will the court
ruling be true and fair.
Interviewer: Incompetent legal
standards having highly lend to court ruling manipulation mostly in matters on
national interest. There are many bodies that are involved in formulating legal
procedures thus resulting to huge corruption. What measures would you recommend
in the judicial system to combat corruption?
Mr. Michael: legal standards have
to be realistic, practical and responsive to legal
issues. Legal terms should not be conflicting but should have the same meaning
across the globe for effective application. Business contracts should have
drafting guiding principles in order to promote legal fairness to all. There
should be routine in-service training to legal professionals. Judicial system
should have a code of ethics that should be enforced through appropriate
procedures by reliable professionals.
Interviewer: It is clear that we
need to strengthen the judicial branch for effective law enforcement. Judicial
ruling has to be fairly carried out as to the verdict of the court. Culprits
have to be punished according to the law without any inequalities. Judiciary
has to be seen to be delivering effective and correct verdicts. How would you ensure fairness in culprits
serving their legal sentences?
Mr. Michael: legal verdicts should
be geared at enhancing morality in the society. This is only possible when
judicial system ensure non-discriminative law enforcement amongst the
residents. Any leniency would jeopardize the essence of law and the need to
adhere to it. Those who break the law should be equally punished no matter
their status in the society. However, law enforcer should be respective, polite
and mature for effective collaboration with the society in promoting fairness.
Interviewer: judicial reforms can only be achieved in a
well organized environment for forward positive development. It calls for
excellent skills in planning and implementing. How would you turn judicial
reforms plans into actions?
Mr. Michael: Plans implementation
requires adequate resources both financial and human capital. There should be collaboration between
government and the judiciary to ensure smooth development in enhancing justice
in the country. Funds need to be made available at the right time as well as
employing the right number of qualified and competent judicial staff. Resource availability will form the bottom
line to legal reform success.
Interviewer: Thank you Mr. Michael
for your time and responses to the panel’s questions. Your opinion is highly regarded and we look
forward to communicating to you soon. Thank you.
No comments:
Post a Comment