Achieving
and maintaining individual excellence enables a person achieve personal growth
in line with human resource capabilities (Young, 2004, p. 139). This study
provides an analysis of personal strengths, weaknesses and areas of growth, in line
with various aspects of human resource functions. Analysis is also made with regard
to Peter Senge’s five forces. Comprehensively, it entails personal analysis of
ways to achieve and maintain individual success.
Force
Field Analysis
Managing the environment
incorporates organizing both internal and external organizational to achieve
overall corporate success (Gitman, 2008, p. 127). This needs to be done
comprehensively and requires a person with strategic foresight and the ability
to look at the bigger picture. I believe I have the strategic foresight to
analyze both internal and external factors though my biggest restraint is handling
the views of other team players. Currently, managing the environment is done in
contemporary ways which don’t conform to the turbulent global environment that characterizes
the business environment today. My desire is to see more updated ways of environment
management adopted.
With regard to planning and program
design, I believe I have the ability to learn fast but my biggest restraint
rests in the fact that I don’t have adequate experience in the field. At
present, I have a rough idea of what planning and program design entails but my
desire is to be mentored in the field to increase my proficiency. When
referring to Organizational design; the willingness of employees to follow laid
down structures need to be evident (Lawler, 2009). I have the ability to follow
laid down structures without much difficulty but my biggest weakness lies in conforming
to principles that aren’t in line with personal growth goals. Currently, my
personal conviction is that organizational designs should incorporate both
personal and organizational goals but current organizational designs don’t
entail the diversity of employees.
Human resource development should be
done at a personal level. Currently my greatest strength is the willingness to
advance my educational career to the maximum level, but at present, I only have
a high school education. I believe this is my greatest weakness because it
doesn’t reflect a high stature in human resource development. I hope to get a masters
degree as an advancement of my human resource skills and probably get a PHD
degree in the near future. My biggest restraint however will be time.
With regards to supervision, my greatest
strength is the ability to formulate proper strategies to advance the team into
greater heights of success but my biggest weakness is to implement them.
Currently I don’t have the necessary experience to deal with people in a work
or professional environment but my desire is to master the skills in dealing
with people in a professional environment.
In the field of financial
management, my greatest strength is my credibility but my weakness lies in
dealing with many aspects of financial management. Currently, I can deal with unskilled
aspects of financial management but my desire is to acquire financial management
skills in a skilled environment. My skills in information systems are no
different because I can only work well in an unskilled environment but my
desire is to know how to perform well in a highly skilled environment. However,
my greatest strength lies in the fact that I know how to work in a basic
information systems environment. My greatest weakness however lies in getting
attached to contemporary information systems applications.
With regard to program evaluation,
my greatest strength lies in the fact that I am very dynamic and can come up
with a very creative program evaluation program. Nonetheless, my weakness lies
in my lack of patience; especially in seeing my programs materialize.
Currently, I can work best in a small environment but my desire is to achieve excellence
in a larger work environment. As regards leadership and organizational change,
my greatest strength is my charisma but my weakness is my inability to
incorporate the views of everyone. Currently, I would term myself an average leader
because of my charisma and flexibility; which also aligns me well with
organizational change. However, I desire to be an exceptional leader.
The
strengths and weaknesses discussed above can be summarized as follows:
Driving Forces
|
Current State
|
Desired State
|
Restraining Forces
|
Strategic
foresight
|
Adoption
of contemporary ways of managing environment
|
Adoption
of updated ways of environment management
|
Poor
handling of other team
player’s views
|
Ability
to learn fast
|
Lack
of knowledge
|
Mentorship
|
Lack
of adequate experience
|
Ability
to follow laid down structures
|
Lack
of accommodation of divergent views
|
Accommodation
of divergent views
|
Nonconformance
to principles that aren’t in line with personal growth goals
|
Willingness
to advance my educational career to the maximum level
|
High
school education
|
Get a
masters and PHD degree
|
Time
constraint
|
Ability
to formulate proper strategies
|
Inadequate
skills
|
Skill
proficiency in a professional environment
|
Poor
implementation skills
|
Good
credibility
|
Dealing
with unskilled aspects of financial management
|
Acquire
financial management skills in a skilled environment
|
Dealing
with many aspects of financial management
|
Proficiency
in working in a basic skilled environment
|
Working
in an unskilled environment
|
Proficient
in a skilled environment
|
Attachment
to contemporary information systems applications
|
Dynamism
|
Ability
to work in a small environment
|
Ability
to work in a large business environment
|
Lack
of Patience
|
Good
Charisma
|
Average
leader
|
To be
an exceptional leader
|
inability
to incorporate the views of everyone
|
Peter
Senge’s Five Disciplines
Personal growth and learning
requires someone to be a fast learner. My hands-on, proactive approach to tasks
and open mindedness aligns me in a path of personal mastery. This will however
take a considerable amount of time before I achieve perfection. With regard to
mental models, the current business and professional environment provides the
best opportunities for personal growth. However, opportunities should be opened
to everyone and traces of prejudice should be eliminated to provide an equal
opportunity for personal growth to individuals. Every organization should also
have a mission or vision statement that incorporates the collective vision of
every employee. This will improve productivity and efficiency because every
person will feel accommodated in the organization. This should however be done
through proper communication channels in the organization that merges the views
of the management and employees alike (Lawler, 2009).
Team building being a core facet
to organizational success, my ability to work with other people and learn new
things, provides good ground for personal growth. My ability to respect
authority will also go a long way in building team cohesion if all team members
can follow the same steps. With regard to systems thinking my strategic
foresight ability is in alignment to this goal. In fact, I will get the
necessary experience in integrating the four aspects of Senge’s five
disciplines to develop the best strategic foresight. After proper comprehension
of how the system works, I will be in a position to make adjustment for
alignment to growth (Lawler, 2009).
Conclusion
Achieving high levels of personal growth
incorporates self assessment of personal strengths and weaknesses. Growth is
therefore induced when strengths are capitalized and weaknesses turned into
strengths. Peter Senge’s five forces also provide the framework to which these
factors can be maximized to achieve human growth. The development of successful
personal growth can therefore be analyzed through a comprehensive evaluation of
personal skills and weaknesses.
References
Gitman,
L. (2008). The Future of Business: The
Essentials. London: Cengage.
Lawler,
E. (2009). Achieving Excellence in Human
Resource Management. California: Stanford
University press.
Young,
D. (2004). The music of Management:
Applying Organizational Theory. New York: Ash
gate Publishing.
No comments:
Post a Comment