The points for each
question are indicated at the start. Please explain your reasoning. The exam is
“open book,” feel free to consult notes and posted readings- but please do
not copy text with out attributing the correct source. You may first read
the exam and then spend time refreshing your reading of the course content
before starting the exam. Answers should not be excessively long and completed
within the time frame.
1. [25] Twitter: Consider the 100 students in a country who considering a protest to change government policy. Suppose that if more than 50% of the students turn up at the protest then they are a big enough group to change the policy but if less than 50% turn up they will fail to change the policy. Moreover a student faces a 10% risk of being arrested if less than 50% turn up. Suppose that the benefit to each student of changing the policy is 10 and the cost of being arrested is -10 so the expected cost of arrest is -1.
(a) If we think of this as strategic situation where each
student has to decide to join the protest and that equilibrium is when each
student is choosing their own best action given the action of the other
students. What do you think is the equilibrium outcome(s). Explain your
reasoning.
(b) Suppose now the students all have twitter and can
communicate endlessly to each other. What do you think is the most likely
equilibrium outcome? The Turkish Prime Minister Ergodan, recently tried to regulate
twitter does your answer suggest why.2.
[25] Development: The
guest lecture by Dollie Davis (paper attached) presented a discussion of three
reasons why some countries have remained poor. Explain what you think of the
argument that the role of institutions and the “rule of law” are important to
economic development.
4.
[25] Polarization: Explain
the apparent increase in political polarization in the US- in particular what
do you think are the major drivers of polarization and why.
3.
[25] FCC: In the mid 1990s
the government introduced spectrum auctions as a market allocation mechanism
replacing the traditional allocation by administrative decisions process. Why
do think this change was implemented and did it improve welfare?
No comments:
Post a Comment